Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

How does this option compare to ROE's other full-arch fixed materials?

ROE offers a spectrum of full-arch fixed materials, from softer options through to nearly clinically indestructible designs. The metal-substructure TLZ-IB is positioned for maximum strength and space-limited cases. The table below compares esthetics, wear, and substructure, with price and prosthetic-design details summarized in the prose that follows.

Option Esthetics Wear Substructure
TLZ-IB Zirconia 5/5 5/5 Full zirconia
TLZ-IB with Metal Substructure 4/5 5/5 Titanium
NobelProcera 5/5 5/5 DOCERAM Nacera Pearl Zirconia
G-CAM Graphenano 4/5 3/5 Trilor or titanium

Relative price. The metal-substructure TLZ-IB carries the highest relative price in this group ($$$$$), reflecting the titanium framework and the longer 11-day lab time. The full-zirconia TLZ-IB and NobelProcera sit one tier below ($$$$), and G-CAM Graphenano is the most economical option ($$).

Prosthetic design levels. This product is restricted to the FP3 design (full prosthetic gingiva), whereas the full-zirconia TLZ-IB, NobelProcera, and G-CAM each offer the full FP1, FP2, and FP3 range. If a case calls for FP1 or FP2 with maximum strength, discuss alternatives with ROE during planning.

Per the ebooks, ROE's broader full-arch lineup also includes DFAZ (coping-free monolithic zirconia) and G-CAM Nanoceramic (a lightweight option for all patient types except heavy bruxers). For a strength-tier walkthrough, see ROE's "Full Arch Options: Strength Guide" video on the product page.

 

Resources

    Contact Information

    For immediate chairside support or troubleshooting assistance, contact ROE Dental Laboratory: