Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

How do titanium and chrome-cobalt partials compare?

Titanium and chrome-cobalt frameworks share the same clinical design principles, so the choice comes down to weight, biocompatibility, long-term retention, and esthetics. Published research (e.g., the Saudi Dental Journal, 2024) reports that titanium has higher resistance to deformation than chrome-cobalt, which translates into better retention over time, especially after many insertion/removal cycles. Titanium's fracture resistance is at least as good as chrome-cobalt; combined with its much lighter weight, that yields a clear clinical advantage. In side-by-side trials, patients consistently chose titanium over chrome-cobalt on comfort alone.

Attribute SLM Titanium Chrome-Cobalt (CoCr)
Weight ~60% lighter Baseline
Biocompatibility Nickel-free Ti-6Al-4V; safest choice for metal sensitivities Modern alloys are nickel-free but can still trigger sensitivities in some patients
Esthetics Natural grayish tone, blends with gingiva; allows thinner design Standard metal appearance
Deformation resistance Higher Baseline
Retention after ~6,000 cycles (~3.5 yrs of use) Retains ~91% (~9% loss) Retains ~25% (~75% loss)
Fracture resistance At least equal to CoCr Baseline
Clasp performance Equal or better; ductile and adjustable Baseline
Framework production (SLM) ~3 days to a fully polished framework Comparable with SLM
Total lab days 13 12
Price (as of Apr 2026) $489.00 $444.00

Prices and turnaround are subject to change; contact ROE for current figures.

 

Additional Resources

For more information concerning the digital dentures:

 

Contact Information

For help with a digital denture solution for your next case, contact ROE Dental Laboratory: