Skip to content
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

How does IPS e.max Monolithic compare to ROE's other fixed restoration materials?

The table below summarizes ROE's fixed restoration lineup so you can position IPS e.max Monolithic against the alternatives. Strength values are flexural strength as stated by ROE; star ratings reflect ROE's relative scoring.

Product Material Flexural strength Esthetics Wear Relative price
IPS e.max® Monolithic Lithium disilicate 530 MPa ★★★ ★★★★ $
IPS e.max® Layered Lithium disilicate + low-fusing porcelain 400 MPa ★★★★★ ★★★★ $$$$
PFZ (Porcelain Fused Zirconia) 4Y zirconia + low-fusing porcelain 250 MPa ★★★★★ ★★★★ $$$$
TLZ Zirconia with MiYO® Full-contour 4Y zirconia + MiYO® liquid ceramic 1100 MPa ★★★★ ★★★★★ $
zRc Zirconia Full-contour 4Y zirconia 1100 MPa ★★★ ★★★★★ $
PFM (Porcelain Fused Metal) Metal + opaque + layered porcelain 200 MPa ★★★ ★★★★ $$$
Full Cast Metal Non-precious, noble, or high-noble alloy N/A ★★ ★★★★★ $

In short, IPS e.max Monolithic sits in a value position: it offers the most translucency of ROE's monolithic options at a lower cost than the layered and porcelain-fused esthetic products, while delivering reliable strength for single-unit anterior and bicuspid work.

 

Additional Resources

For more information concerning IPS e.max Monolithic:

Contact Information

For help with a Locator Fixed solution for your next case, contact ROE Dental Laboratory: